Judd v. Judd’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1955
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coosa River Steamboat Co. v. Barclay · Paschal v. Perez · Searcy v. Stubbs · Atkinson v. Dunlap · In re Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There can be no doubt that, if the terms of that act apply to the facts of this case, it is within the provisions of the act. It is claimed by the solicitor on the part of the defendant that, as the decree was entered before this act. was passed this case is not within its provisions. It is said that the statute is penal in its nature, and is not retrospective.” .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It is true the legislature cannot interfere with vested rights; but is the act in question an interference with vested rights? It does not change the amount of the decree. It does not increase the liability of defendant. It simply provides a remedy for the collection of a decree which defendant is legally and morally bound to pay.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The decree, in addition to other things, provided for the payment by defendant to complainant of $75 on the 1st day of each month for permanent alimony for the support of the complainant and the child.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.