¶1The defendant was convicted of pet-it larceny before a justice of the peace and again on appeal in the circuit court. The record does not show an arraignment and hence the convictionwaswithoutwarrant of law. [State v. Llewellyn, 93 Mo. App. 469; State v. VanHook, 88 Mo. 105.] The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
125 Mo. App. 464
State v. Ambrose
Decided May 20, 1907
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1907-05-20
— No». Howard Gray, Judge. There was no arraignment of the defendant. There was therefore no issue to be tried by the jury. State v. Lewellen, 93 Mo. App. 469; State v. Hull, 73 Mo. App. 300; State v. VanHook, 88 Mo. App. 105; State v. Sharpe, 95 S. W. 298. W. N. Andrews and H. L. Bright, fór respondent, filed no brief.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1913
1 state decisions
Relies on State v. Vanhook · State v. Llewellyn
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed and remanded · Decided 1907-05-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →