Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 MOAPP 474 - Pond v. Huling

Pond v. Huling’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1930
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1930

4 state decisions

201907191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. Place · Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Smith · Jourolmon v. Massengill · State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. Louis · Chouteau v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no disputing the rule, that such a plea (res adjudicata) should state the issues, so that the court may see whether or not the plea is available as a bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.