State v. Storm’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2010
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Pfanschmidt · People v. Mullings · Day v. State · Hodge v. State · Kinnan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To place the accused at the scene of the crime the state relied upon the so-called `bloodhound testimony.' It alone placed him there.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Storm“It is unsafe evidence, and both reason and instinct condemn it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the reasons on which he acted were good or bad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.