Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 N.C. App. 161 - State v. Caldwell

125 N.C. App. 161 - State v. Caldwell’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2016

24 state decisions

180199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 111 N.C. App. 448 - Wagoner v. Hiatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court shall make findings of the aggravating and mitigating factors present in the offense only if, in its discretion, it departs from the presumptive range of sentences specified in G.S. 15A-1340.17(c)(2).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he legislature intended the trial court to take into account factors in aggravation and mitigation only when deviating from the presumptive range in sentencing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[our] Legislature [clearly] intended to provide the trial court with a window of discretion to be exercised when sentencing a criminal defendant within the presumptive range. It is not the province of this Court to impose the additional requirement that the trial court justify its decision by making findings of aggravation and mitigation subject to appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.