Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 NEB 731 - Gilbert v. Bryant

Gilbert v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
5
states following
July 1964
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1964 · most notably Born v. Estate of Matzner (1954), Hamblen v. Steckley (1947)

25 state decisions

1601933194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaw, Admr. v. Moore · Morris v. Erskine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The owner or operator of a motor vehicle shall not be liable for any damages to any passenger or person riding in such motor vehicle as a guest or by invitation and not for hire, unless such damage is caused by the driver of such motor vehicle being under the influence of intoxicating liquor or because of the gross negligence of the owner or operator in the operation of such motor vehicle.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Gross negligence means great or excessive negligence; that is, negligence in a very high degree. It may be said that it indicates the absence of even slight care in the performance of a duty, and such, we think, is the meaning intended by the legislature.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Gross negligence is equivalent to the failure to exercise even a slight degree of care.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.