State v. Fleming’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Stalheim · State v. Blanchard · 568 F. Supp. 516 - United States v. Welden · State v. Benoit · 79 Mich. App. 739 - People v. Heil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A judgment against an unemployed criminal would be of little assistance because collecting such a judgment would be a cumbersome and difficult, if not impossible, task .... Accordingly, should a court determine that a criminal defendant is judgment-proof, i.e., that pursuing a civil judgment would be impractical, it should also find that, as a practical matter, no other compensation is available to the victim.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stearns“to encourage the compensation of victims by the person most responsible for the loss incurred by the victim, the offender. Restitution by the offender can serve to reinforce the offender’s sense of responsibility for the offense, to provide him the opportunity to pay his debt to society and to his victim in a constructive manner, and to ease the burden of the victim as a result of the criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Eno“Any offender may be sentenced to make restitution. Such restitution may be in addition to a fine and may be a condition of probation or parole. Restitution may also be authorized as a condition of any work release program administered under RSA 651:19 or 25.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.