State v. Sarracino’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Martinez (1999), Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co. (2003)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gomez · State v. Sutphin · State v. Apodaca · State v. Ortega · State v. Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the admission of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard and will not reverse in the absence of a clear abuse.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez · State v. Casillas“An abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances of the case. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by its ruling unless we can characterize [the ruling] as clearly untenable or not justified by reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez“although contrary evidence is presented which may have supported a different verdict, the appellate court will not weigh the evidence or foreclose a finding of substantial evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. OWELICIO
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.