Stock v. Grantham’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Trujillo v. Nora (2001), Trujillo v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc. (2001)
6 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 631 (§ 12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Briscoe v. W · Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Inc. · Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · Mark V, Inc. v. Mellekas · Schmitz v. Smentowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he only function of the claim of prima facie tort in [plaintiff's] complaint is to escape possible restrictions imposed on the torts of intentional infliction of emotional distress and interference with entitlement to unemployment compensation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“recognize[d] that only in extreme circumstances can the act of firing an employee support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trujillo v. Nora“utterly intolerable in a civilized community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trujillo v. Nora
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.