State v. Roman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably State v. Rendleman (2003), State v. Wilson (2007)
62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rowell · State v. Gallegos · State v. Trivitt · John Does v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Inc. · State v. Armijo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No variance between those allegations of a complaint, indictment, information or any supplemental pleading which state the particulars of the offense, whether amended or not, and the evidence offered in support thereof shall be grounds for acquittal of the defendant unless such variance prejudices substantial rights of the defendant. The court may at any time allow the indictment or information to be amended in respect to any variance to conform to the evidence ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Branch“Interpretation and application of the law are subject to a de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.