State v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson (1999), State v. Herrera (2001)
2 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McMann v. Richardson · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court abuses its discretion when it . . . commits manifest error by accepting a plea that is not knowingly and voluntarily given. Where, as here, a defendant is represented by an attorney during the plea process and enters a plea upon the advice of that attorney, the voluntariness and intelligence of the defendant's plea generally depends on whether the attorney rendered ineffective assistance in counseling the plea. We afford de novo review of mixed questions of law and fact concerning the ineffective assistance of counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlos · State v. Carlos“[T]he abuse-of-discretion standard does not preclude an appellate court from correcting errors premised on the trial court's misapprehension of the law[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlos · State v. Edwards“Failure to make adequate pretrial investigation and preparation may ... be grounds for finding ineffective assistance of counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Barela · State v. Miera
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.