125 Ohio App. 3d 13 - State v. Tomlinson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Schiebel · State ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus · State ex rel. Koren v. Grogan · 13 Ohio App. 3d 117 - State v. Shepard · State ex rel. Leis v. Outcalt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Before granting immunity, the common pleas court must also determine, in its discretion, whether the prosecutor's request for immunity would further the administration of justice.' " State v. Tomlinson , 125 Ohio App.3d 13 , 18, 707 N.E.2d 955 (11th Dist.1997), quoting State v. Asher , 112 Ohio App.3d 646 , 653, 679 N.E.2d 1147 (1st Dist.1996). "The decision of whether to grant immunity rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frye“'Before granting immunity, the common pleas court must also determine, in its discretion, whether the prosecutor's request for immunity would further the administration of justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frye
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.