Mannix v. Harju’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
3 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1982
3 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co. · Seidel v. Chick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"There is no statute which authorizes the relief of a new trial in an equity suit. The statute authorizing the granting of a new trial applies only to law actions and has no application to a suit in equity. See In re Seidel's Estate, 64 Or. 321, 324 ( 130 Pac. 53 ), and Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Inv. Co., 121 Or. 582, 587 ( 256 Pac. 646 ). * * *"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waldow v. Waldow“* * * left the case as it was before the entry of a decree and restored in the court its power to enter a proper decree or do any other act which the court could lawfully have done before the entry of the vacated decree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waldow v. Waldow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.