State v. CMB’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan · 70 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Allen · Matter of Dependency of AEP · Mont Trucking, Inc. v. Entrada Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following persons are incompetent to testify: (1) Those who aire of unsound mind, or intoxicated at the time of their production for examination; and (2) children who do not have the capacity of receiving just impressions of the facts about which they are examined or who do not have the capacity of relating them truly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. S.J.W.“[e]very person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided by statute or by court rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SJW“set out a scheme where a witness of any age is presumed competent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.