Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 SO3D 1007 - Calamia v. State

Calamia v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · Stewart v. State · Ramsey v. State · State v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a. extort money [or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever] from [ (name of person) ] [any person], b. compel [ (name of person) ] [any person] to do any act or refrain from doing any act against [his][or][her] will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.