Louissant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 103 So. 3d 134 - Lukehart v. State · 966 So. 2d 298 - Riechmann v. State · 3 So. 3d 974 - Parker v. State · 868 So. 2d 1214 - City of Hollywood v. Witt · 530 So. 2d 449 - Lewis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330, a motion to disqualify must “allege specifically the facts and reasons upon which the movant relies as the grounds for disqualification.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c)(2). The motion must show “that the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.