Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 SW3D 246 - Varble v. Commonwealth

Varble v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Solem v. Helm · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Fisher v. United States · Doe v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute does not require that the equipment was actually used to manufacture methamphetamine but only that it could be so used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all of the chemicals or all of the equipment necessary to manufacture methamphetamine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a significant departure from the bright line rule announced in Kotila .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.