Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 SW3D 45 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 299th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · McMann v. Richardson · Almanza v. State · Boykin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An offense under Subsection (c) of this section is ... (2) punishable by confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for life or for a term of not more than 99 years or less than 10 years and a fine not to exceed $ 100,000, if the amount of the controlled substance possessed is, by aggregate weight, including any adulterants or dilutants, 400 grams or more.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.