Blue v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Ring v. Arizona · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“maximum” is not the maximum sentence that may be imposed after a jury finding of additional punish- ment facts, but the maximum that may be imposed without any additional jury findings. The maximum sentence that may be imposed upon a Texas capital defendant [by the time the jury reaches the mitigation special issue] alone is life imprisonment. In order to receive death, his sentencing jury must also return a [”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perry v. State“The [Supreme] Court ... has upheld the constitutionality of aggravating factors ranging from whether the defendant was a ‘cold-blooded, pitiless slayer,’ to whether the ‘perpetrator inflict[ed] mental anguish or physical abuse before the victim’s death,’ to whether the defendant ‘would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coble v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.