Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 SW3D 521 - Rayford v. State

Rayford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2022 · most notably Montanez v. State (2006), Russeau v. State (2005)

6 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

460200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he validity of a consent to search is a question of fact to be determined from all the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A voluntary consensual search is an exception to the probable cause and warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Contrary to appellant's claims, we know of no authority that requires informing a suspect of his rights under Miranda before obtaining a consent to search, and appellant points to none.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.