Pham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cantu v. State · Russell v. State · Bell v. State · Bell v. State · Boyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ased on Roquemore , and based on the fact that our attenuation-of-the-taint analysis in Pham I was found inadequate to satisfy a Gonzales causal-connection analysis, we conclude that there are separate analyses for causal connection and attenuation of the taint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pham v. State“most clearly demonstrating separate analyses for causal connection and attenuation of the taint, and the order in which they are to be undertaken, is Roquemore .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pham v. State“reasonable to place the burden on the defendant to produce evidence to which only the defendant has access.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.