Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 TC 301 - Murphy v. Comm'r

Murphy v. Comm'r’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

457
cited by 457 later decisions
October 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 457 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Thompson v. Commissioner (2013), Kindred v. Commissioner (2006)

2 federal appellate ·

3590200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6330

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Califano v. Sanders · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Goza v. Commissioner · United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 457 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence that * * * [a taxpayer] might have presented at the section 6330 hearing (but chose not to) is not admissible in a trial conducted pursuant to section 6330(d)(1) because it is not relevant to the question of whether the Appeals officer abused her discretion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “attempt to conduct a * * * [section 6330 ] hearing and issue a Notice of Determination as expeditiously as possible under the circumstances.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “raise at the hearing any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax or the proposed levy”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.