Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 Tex. 212 - E. M. Goodwin, Inc. v. Stuart

E. M. Goodwin, Inc. v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1973

16 state decisions

8019351940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is so well settled as to be fundamentally and universally recognized that equitable relief by specific performance will not be granted when the other party does not have a mutual or correlative right to the same equitable remedy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.