Crowder v. Crowder’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Estate Construction Co. v. Miller & Smith Holding Co. (1994), BLOUNT v. Blount (1957)
3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goff v. Goff · Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp. · De Ruiter v. De Ruiter · Bouslough v. Bouslough · Hazlewood v. Forrer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While fraud must be clearly proved by him who alleges it, it is not necessary that it should be expressly shown. It is rare that it can be. The participants are not apt to discuss it, but actions speak louder than words, and the transaction itself often furnishes proof of the fraud that is entirely satisfactory. * * *””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Every . . . transfer of ... any estate, real or personal . . . given with intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors ... or other persons of or from what they are or may be lawfully entitled to shall, as to such creditors ... or other persons be void.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bray v. Caswell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.