Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 Vt. 272 - In Re Murphy

In Re Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1982

24 state decisions

140196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States ex rel. Feeley v. Ragen · In Re Mears · In Re Greenough · Martinez v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unless the record as a whole demonstrates the representation is so rife with shortcomings and of such low caliber as to amount to no representation, judgment of conviction on a plea of guilty will not be vitiated on the claim of inadequate counsel.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Whenever the court in good faith appoints or accepts the appearance of a member of the bar in good standing to represent a defendant the presumption is that such counsel is competent, otherwise he would not be in good standing at the bar and accepted by the court. The Constitution requirements have been met as to the necessity of counsel .... Unless the record as a whole demonstrates the representation is so rife with shortcomings and of such low caliber as to amount to no representation, judgment of conviction on a plea of guilty will not be vitiated on the claim of inadequate counsel.” In Re Murphy, 125 Vt. 272, 274 , 214 A.2d 317 (1965). (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.