Huff v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 301 Ill. App. 3d 349 - Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered · 86 Wash. 2d 215 - Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co. · Keller v. City of Spokane · 87 Wash. 2d 400 - Peters v. Simmons · 29 Wash. App. 433 - Sherry v. Diercks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the statute of limitations defense was actually raised in their Oregon personal injury lawsuit. We find that the negligence claim accrued upon suffering injury, meaning damage. We further clarify that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huff v. Roach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.