Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 WIS 169 - Schultz v. Culbertson

Schultz v. Culbertson’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 1960
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1960

11 state decisions

201905191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brader v. Brader · Lee v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. · Wollman v. Ruehle · Burnham v. Mitchell · In re Will of Hunt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such answer filed by his authorized attorney, and adopted by the client by proceeding to and through trial thereon, was an admission, conclusive only so long as the pleading remained unamended, but still evidentiary even after substitution of another answer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.