Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 ALA 83 - Barker v. State

Barker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1991

6 state decisions

3018991900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Good reason to apprehend an attack does not give to the defendant the absolute and unqualified right to carry a weapon concealed about his person. The extent of the statute is that he may give this fact in evidence, which the jury are authorized to ‘consider in mitigation of the punishment, or justification of the offense.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.