Gee v. Pima County’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2009
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. · Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. · 22 Ariz. App. 356 - City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc. · 27 Ariz. App. 611 - Schuldes v. National Surety Corporation · 278 F. Supp. 894 - Lehigh Chemical Co. v. Celanese Corp. of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the intentional publication of an injurious falsehood”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.