State v. Hannah’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 154 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 158 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably State v. Christian (2003), Ripplinger v. Collins (1989)
4 federal appellate · 154 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lopez · State v. Hannah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Convictions for two or more offenses not committed on the same occasion but consolidated for trial purposes, may, at the discretion of the state, be counted as prior convictions for purposes of this section. Convictions for two or more offenses committed on the same occasion shall be counted as only one conviction for purposes of this section.””
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]o long as the defendant was convicted of the other offense before the conviction in the principal offense, the enhanced punishment provisions of § 13-604(B) are applicable. In fact, subsection H of § 13-604 makes it clear that conviction of the other offense need not occur prior to the commission of the principal offense____”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rybolt · State v. Driggs“[I]f the offender commits two robberies on two different days and the felonies are consolidated for trial, a conviction for the first robbery may be used to invoke the provisions of § 703 [currently § 13-604(H) ] in the event the felon is convicted on the second count....”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sands · State v. Perkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.