Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 ARK 188 - Southwick v. State

Southwick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2007

5 state decisions

201916192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. State · Blais v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The use of the disjunctive `or' between the words `intimidation' and 'threats' in the statute was not in the sense of indicating that they are two different things, but was only used as an alias to designate the same thing by different words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.