126 Cal. App. 2d 513 - Gillespie v. Ormsby’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably 2 Cal. 3d 285 - Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (1970), 147 Cal. App. 2d 357 - Stevens v. Marco (1956)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 42 Cal. 2d 682 - Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co. · 27 Cal. 2d 131 - Sears v. Rule · 25 Cal. 2d 48 - Lloyd v. Murphy · The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co. · 20 Cal. 2d 286 - Rogers v. Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Deceit may be negative as well as affirmative; it may consist in suppression of that which it is one's duty to disclose, as well as in the declaration of that which is false.' ( Gillespie v. Ormsby [1954] 126 Cal. App.2d 513, 527 [ 272 P.2d 949 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Wraxall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.