Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 CALAPP2D 597 - Schindler v. Schindler

Schindler v. Schindler’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 1998 · most notably Kenney v. Kenney (1954), 23 Cal. App. 3d 343 - McLellan v. McLellan (1972)

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

28019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 41 Cal. 2d 202 - Gudelj v. Gudelj · 23 Cal. 2d 754 - Tomaier v. Tomaier · Siberell v. Siberell · 122 Cal. App. 2d 116 - Thomasset v. Thomasset · 36 Cal. 2d 342 - Socol v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`that the property is as described in the deed and the burden is on the party who seeks to rebut the presumption.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.