126 Conn. App. 30 - Coss v. Steward’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Standard Tallow Corp. v. Jowdy · Doty v. Mucci · Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · Prokolkin v. General Motors Corporation · Morris v. Costa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Practice Book § 13-5 provides in relevant part: Upon motion by a party from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the judicial authority may make any order which justice requires to protect a party from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following ... that the discovery may be had only on specified terms ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he [trial] court's inherent authority to issue protective orders is embodied in Practice Book § 13-5.... The use of protective orders and the extent of discovery is within the discretion of the trial judge.... We have long recognized that the granting or denial of a discovery request ... is subject to reversal only if such an order constitutes an abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. The following colloquy occurred after counsel's assertion:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.