Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.1d 630 - Kellar v. Craig

Kellar v. Craig’s Empirical Analysis

126 F. 630 · 1903

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1933
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1933

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

401903191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frost v. Spitley · John Orton v. George Smith · Fussell v. Gregg · Young v. Forest Oil Co. · Harness v. Eastern Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all leases for oil and gas purposes, a covenant to ‘protect the lines’ of and ‘well develop’ the land leased is implied by law, and so it follows that the general words relating to those matters, inserted in the lease under consideration, really add nothing to the obligations assumed by the lessee concerning such work. In such leases, where general covenants of that character are found or are implied, the lessee or his assigns are permitted to determine the character of the work to be done, and such ascertainment by him or them, in the absence of fraud, disposes of the question.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.