Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.1d 916 - Wilson v. Smith

Wilson v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

126 F. 916 · 1904

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1930
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Case v. Beauregard · Durant v. Essex Co. · Wilson v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A decree dimissing a bill in equity, which is absolute in its terms, unless made upon some ground which does not go to the merits, is a final determination of the controversy, and constitutes a liar .to any further litigation of the same subject between the same parties. Durant v. Essex Co., 7 Wall. 107 , 19 L. Ed. 154 ; Case v. Beauregard, 101 U. S. 688 , 25 L. Ed. 1004 . And in the absence of words of qualification accompanying the decree, such as ‘without prejudice,’ and other terms indicating a right or privilege to talie further proceedings on the subject, the decree of dismissal is presumed to be rendered on the merits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.