Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 F.2d 470

Docket No. 9949.

McAninch v. Squier

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 9, 1942.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-02-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1946

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Weldon O. McAninch, in pro. per., for appellant.

¶2J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and Frank Hale, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the transcript of record and briefs filed by respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered order of the District Court affirmed, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate issue as provided in rule.

/126/f2d/470 · .json · Public domain