Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 F.2d 624

Docket No. 165.

Yates v. McGowan

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1942.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-03-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1943

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Fairbanks v. United States · Felin v. Kyle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1O’Brian, Hellings, Ulsh & Morey, of Buffalo, N. Y., for appellant.

¶2Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Louis Monarch, Helen R. Carloss, and Paul R. Russell, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and George L. Grobe, U. S. Atty., and R. Norman Kirchgraber, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Buffalo, N. Y., for appellee.

¶3Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Point I of appellant’s brief was not misapprehended or left undecided. The transactions from which he derived taxable gain were the 1930 and 1931 redemptions of bonds acquired in 1927. Hence Fairbanks v. United States, 306 U.S. 436, 438, 59 S.Ct. 607, 83 L.Ed. 855, is controlling. That the bonds were acquired in 1927 in exchange for capital assets in a non-taxable transaction does not affect the character of the later transactions from which the taxable gain was derived. See Felin v. Kyle, 3 Cir., 102 F.2d 349.

¶6Petition for rehearing denied.

/126/f2d/624 · .json · Public domain