Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.2d 767 - Roos v. Texas Co.

Roos v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.2d 767 · 1942

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 1955
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Ruhlin v. New York Life Insurance · Russell v. Todd · Russell v. Todd · Roos v. Texas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That statutes of limitation are applicable to equitable causes in Texas is clear. Texas has a blended system of jurisprudence, the same court administering both legal and equitable causes, and it has long been settled that the statutes of limitation of the state are `equally applicable, whether the relief sought be legal or equitable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.