Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.2d 827 - United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.

United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.2d 827 · 1942

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Sidebotham v. Robison (1954), Machado v. McGrath (1951)

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

15019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Baltimore Co v. Phillips · Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co. · Glanzer v. . Shepard · Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The deficiencies * * * were not such as to call for that action, at least without attention being first directed to them and an opportunity afforded for their correction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.