Sharpe v. FDIC’s Empirical Analysis
126 F.3d 1147 · 1997
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Underwood v. Wilson (1998), Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1998)
23 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1811 (Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act) · 12 U.S.C. § 1813 · 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Winstar Corp. · Lynch v. United States · O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance · In re Vey · Caso v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver, including assets which the Corporation may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The receiver, in any case involving the liquidation or winding up of the affairs of a closed depository institution shall — (i) promptly publish a notice to the depository institution’s creditors to present their claims, together with proof, to the receiver by a date specified in the notice which shall be not less than 90 days after publication of such notice. 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(3)(B)(i).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'steps into the shoes' " of the failed financial institution, assuming all the rights and obligations of the defunct bank. Id. at 1152 (quoting O'Melveny & Meyers v. FDIC, 512 U.S. 79 , 86-87 (1994) ). And "[t]he actions of the failed bank are considered the actions of the FDIC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.