Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.3d 1323 - Onishea v. Hopper

Onishea v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.3d 1323 · 1997

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2019

7 federal appellate ·

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Turner v. Safley · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “elimination of high risk behavior is impossible.... Because the Defendant/Prison system has decided that such conduct is likely, and because of the catastrophic severity of the consequences if such conduct does occur, this Court holds that integrating the [program under discussion] would present a significant risk of transmitting the deadly HIV virus. Accordingly, the HIV+ inmates are not 'otherwise qualified.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the significance of a risk is a product of the odds that transmission will occur and the severity of the consequences,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Webster's Third International Dictionary 2116 (1986). It does not just mean”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.