Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.3d 144 - Steinhardt Group Inc. v. Citicorp

Steinhardt Group Inc. v. Citicorp’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.3d 144 · 1997

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Infinity Group Company (2000), Armstrong Surgical Center, Inc. v. Armstrong County Memorial Hospital (1999)

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Tcherepnin v. Knight · Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp. · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries Inc Ct

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he term investment contract has not been defined by Congress, nor does the legislative history to the 1933 and 1934 Acts illuminate what Congress intended by the term investment contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “meaningfully participated in the management of the partnership in which it has invested such that it has more than minimal control over the investment's performance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the purchaser [is] attracted to the investment by the prospect of a profit on the investment rather than a desire to use or consume the item purchased.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.