Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King’s Empirical Analysis
126 F.3d 25 · 1997
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 25 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp. (2000), Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez (1999)
19 federal appellate · 25 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc. · Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Robertson-Ceco Corp. · Fetner v. Haggerty · Sims v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Acts which are the basis of jurisdiction. As to a cause of action arising from any of the acts enumerated in this section, a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary ... who in person or through an agent: 1. transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state; or 2. commits a tortious act within the state ...; or 3. commits a tortious act without the state causing injury to person or property within the state ... if he (i) regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered, in the state, or (ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or 4. owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In assessing whether personal jurisdiction is authorized, 'the court must first look to the long-arm statute of the forum state, in this instance New York.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the exercise of jurisdiction is appropriate under that statute, the court must decide whether such exercise comports with the requisites of due process.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.