United States v. Hastings’s Empirical Analysis
126 F.3d 310 · 1997
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Hammoud (2004), McDonald v. Village of Winnetka (2004)
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Armstrong · United States v. Mezzanatto · United States v. Berrios · United States v. Russell · United States v. Peskin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining a suitable and effective sanction, a court must weigh the reasons for the government's delay and whether it acted intentionally or in bad faith; the degree of prejudice, if any, suffered by the defendant; and whether any less severe sanction will remedy the prejudice and the wrongdoing of the government.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a court sanctions the government in a criminal case for its failure to obey. court orders, it must use the least severe sanction which will adequately punish the government and secure future compliance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]efendants are similarly situated when their circumstances present no distinguishable legitimate prosecutorial factors that might justify making different prosecutorial decisions with respect to them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.