Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.3d 365 - Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.3d 365 · 1997

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
5
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably 184 Ill. 2d 290 - River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park (1998), Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'n (1998)

27 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

4601997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the facts essential to the second were [already] present in the first.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]ven where a second action arises from some of the same factual circumstances that gave rise to a prior action, res judicata is inapplicable if formal jurisdictional or statutory barriers precluded the plaintiff from asserting its claims in the first action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not apply to new rights acquired during the action which might have been, but which were not, litigated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.