Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F.3d 454 - Parham v. Johnson

Parham v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

126 F.3d 454 · 1997

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 25 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital (2002), Montgomery v. Pinchak (2002)

10 federal appellate · 25 district ·

410199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co. · Tabron v. Grace · Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce P W R

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the plaintiffs ability to present his or her own case; (2) the difficulty of the particular legal issues; (3) the degree to which factual investigation will be necessary and the ability of the plaintiff to pursue investigation; (4) the plaintiffs capacity to retain counsel on his own behalf; (5) the extent to which a case is likely to turn on credibility determinations; and (6) whether the case will require testimony from expert witnesses.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A medical malpractice case involves complex facts and medical records that even most lawyers struggle to comprehend. Hence, most of these cases require expert testimony.”); Pinchak, 294 F.3d at 504 (explaining that'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “should consider 'the plaintiff's education, literacy, prior work experience, and prior litigation experience'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.