United States v. Doherty’s Empirical Analysis
126 F.3d 769 · 1997
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2016 · most notably Texas v. Cobb (2001), United States v. Suarez (2001)
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2243 · 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 25 U.S.C. § 1300J · 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 202 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 450M (§ 109 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Gideon v. Wainwright · Edwards v. Arizona · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n extradition hearing has a `modest function' not involving the question of guilt or innocence, and is not a `criminal proceeding' within the meaning of the sixth amendment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2d Cir. 1980) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[aln exception to the offense-specific requirement of the Sixth Amendment occurs when the pending charge is so inextricably intertwined with the charge under investigation that the right to counsel for the pending charge cannot constitutionally be isolated from the right to counsel for the uncharged offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jewell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.