Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 F. App'x 621

Watkins v. Compton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-04-25

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. Moscato · Pelissero v. Thompson

Decided 2005-04-25

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

¶3*622Christopher Michael Watkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Watkins v. Compton, No. CA-04-251-7 (W.D.Va., filed May 14, 2004; entered May 17, 2004); see also Pelissero v. Thompson, 170 F.3d 442, 445 (4th Cir.1999); Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 98 F.3d 757, 760 (3d Cir.1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED

/126/fappx/621 · .json · Public domain