126 F. Supp. 2d 321 - Todd v. Exxon Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of Dentists · Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“]. On behalf of herself and all other similarly situated current and former Exxon employees (the putative class), 2 plaintiff alleges that defendants violated § 1 of the Sherman Act by regularly sharing detailed information regarding compensation paid to nonunion managerial, professional, and technical (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Todd v. Exxon Corp.“even if the proposed market were oligopolistic, plaintiff still could not establish its susceptibility to the exercise of market power through tacit coordination. The `products' in her proposed market are, as discussed above, far from fungible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Todd v. Exxon Corp.“This survey sought and obtained current data on the actual compensation paid by defendants to employees in various `job families.' The information gathered was distributed to the survey participants several times a year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Todd v. Exxon Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.